Skip to content
Head of Legal Logo Head of Legal Logo
  • Home
  • Me
  • CV
  • Sharia, divorce and arbitration

    Carl Gardner
    January 19, 2012

    On Monday the Guardian published this piece about Sadakat Kadri‘s claim that

    Islamic law can be compatible with the toughest human rights legislation.

    I doubt this very much; and I don’t think my or anyone else’s scepticism is the result […]

    Tags: family, sharia
  • Children’s Rights Alliance v Justice Secretary: campaign groups and human rights

    Carl Gardner
    January 17, 2012

    It’s not unusual nowadays for campaign groups of all kinds to take judicial review proceedings against public authorities: it’s now well established that their knowledge of and involvement in matters of public interest means they can have a sufficient interest […]

    Tags: children, human rights, judicial review
  • R (Bailey) v Brent: law against the cuts (and politics)

    Carl Gardner
    December 20, 2011

    As a resident of Brent in north-west London, I’m not sure what I think about the Labour council’s planned library cuts. I’m not happy that any should be cut. I don’t want social care to be cut any more than […]

    Tags: discrimination, judicial review, local government
  • Lord Irvine’s speech: full text

    Carl Gardner
    December 15, 2011

    Thanks to Paul Dillane, who directed me to the document.

    Tags: human rights, judges
  • Al-Khawaja & Tahery v UK: Lord Irvine vindicated

    Carl Gardner
    December 15, 2011

    In his lecture last night, Lord Irvine invited British judges to become more assertive in deciding human rights cases for themselves, agreeing or disagreeing with the European Court of Human Rights, as they see fit. Today’s judgment from the […]

    Tags: crime, evidence, human rights
  • Lord Irvine: British judges should decide human rights cases for themselves

    Carl Gardner
    December 14, 2011

    Lord Irvine tonight weighed in to the debate about Britain’s relationship with the European Court of Human Rights – and effectively accused the Supreme Court of having surrendered its intellectual independence, and shirked its judicial responsibility.

    His at times toughly-worded lecture […]

    Tags: human rights, judges
  • “Prior protection”: Davies and Campbell are right

    Carl Gardner
    December 2, 2011

    Alistair Campbell blogged yesterday about his appearance and evidence to the Leveson inquiry. He had plenty to say, but I won’t repeat it – read the transcript of his evidence, and the statement he provided.

    What interests me […]

    Tags: freedom of expression, media law
  • Lady Hale’s injudicious speech

    Carl Gardner
    December 2, 2011

    Does Lady Hale wish she were still sitting in the House of Lords, rather than the Supreme Court? Earlier this week she gave a striking speech to the Law Centres Federation conference. She opened her remarks by saying

    It is not […]

    Tags: constitution, judges, legal aid
  • Grieve: Contempt of Court Act “fit for purpose”

    Carl Gardner
    December 1, 2011

    This evening the Attorney General Dominic Grieve has been speaking at City University on the subject “Contempt – a balancing act”.

    Here’s the draft text of his speech – it differed only slightly in delivery. In the document viewer […]

    Tags: attorney general, contempt, courts, media law, parliament
  • Is the government really “on the brink” of success in Strasbourg?

    Carl Gardner
    November 29, 2011

    So the Telegraph reported the week before last, based on an interview with Ken Clarke:

    the Justice Secretary reveals that Britain is poised strike a deal to overhaul the controversial human rights court to stop it being used by […]

    Tags: ecthr, government, human rights, international
Previous293031Next
Copyright 2022 Carl Gardner. Site by Samsara
Page load link
Go to Top