Skip to content
Head of Legal Logo Head of Legal Logo
  • Home
  • Me
  • CV
  • Miranda: the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of “terrorism”

    Carl Gardner
    January 19, 2016

    I’ve already criticised what I think is a fundamental contradiction undermining the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the Miranda case. But there’s another aspect of the judgment that I must mention, which may well be of more lasting […]

    Tags: Court of Appeal, freedom of expression, human rights, interpretation, judicial review, terrorism
  • The self-contradictory Miranda appeal ruling

    Carl Gardner
    January 19, 2016

    I’ve been following for some time David Miranda’s challenge to the lawfulness of his questioning at Heathrow airport in 2013. I wrote shortly after his detention; I covered his application for an injunction;

    Tags: Court of Appeal, freedom of expression, human rights, judicial review, terrorism
  • Pannick on the Reyaad Khan drone strike

    Carl Gardner
    September 17, 2015

    In the Times today Lord Pannick QC discusses the recently announced RAF drone strike that killed Reyaad Khan and another British “Islamic State” fighter.

    He agrees with me that article 51 of the UN Charter permits defence […]

    Tags: defence, government, international, judiciary, lord pannick, terrorism
  • The PM’s “foreign fighters” plan: probably lawful

    Carl Gardner
    November 14, 2014

    Chris Fleming | Creative CommonsOvernight in Australia,

    Tags: government, human rights, immigration, international, terrorism
  • Grieve: Counter-terrorism measures “probably getting to the right place”

    Carl Gardner
    November 14, 2014

    The former Attorney General Dominic Grieve appeared on Radio 4’s World at One Today to discuss the government’s new plan to “regulate” the return to the UK of those who, for instance, have gone to Syria […]

    Tags: Dominic Grieve, government, immigration, international, terrorism
  • R (Miranda) v Home Secretary: witness statement of Detective Supt. Caroline Goode

    Carl Gardner
    October 2, 2013

    A few weeks ago I published the witness statement of Oliver Robbins served on behalf of the Home Secretary in the Miranda case. That statement referred (at para. 32) to a further statement to be served by the police, […]

    Tags: injunctions, judicial review, media law, terrorism
  • Miranda v Home Secretary: today’s hearing and order

    Carl Gardner
    August 22, 2013

    Today’s hearing at the High Court before Lord Justice Beatson and Mr Justice Kenneth Parker was interesting, and not just because of the order they made. But let me turn to that order first.

    The court has ordered that until a […]

    Tags: freedom of expression, government, injunctions, media law, police, terrorism
  • Did the Guardian comply with an “official direction” under the Official Secrets Act?

    Carl Gardner
    August 21, 2013

    Alan Rusbridger revealed in a piece first published on the Guardian website at half past ten on Monday evening how GCHQ security experts […]

    Tags: government, media law, official secrets, terrorism
  • Could David Miranda be a “terrorist”?

    Carl Gardner
    August 20, 2013

    There’s understandably been a great deal of reaction to the nine-hour detention at Heathrow airport of David Miranda, who was travelling as part of his work with Guardian journalists covering Edward Snowden’s disclosures, and whose laptop and memory stick […]

    Tags: media law, national security, official secrets, parliament, terrorism
  • Abu Qatada: a victory for pragmatism and the rule of law

    Carl Gardner
    July 8, 2013

    Photo: Home Office
    Photo: Home Office

    Only a matter of weeks ago, politicians were seriously discussing the possibility that the UK might need to withdraw from the […]

    Tags: attorney general, government, human rights, immigration, terrorism
12Next
Copyright 2022 Carl Gardner. Site by Samsara
Page load link
Go to Top