Skip to content
Head of Legal Logo Head of Legal Logo
  • Home
  • Me
  • CV
  • The draft EU (Voter Registration) Regulations 2016

    Carl Gardner
    June 9, 2016

    Here are the draft regulations that will […]

    Tags: elections, government, judicial review, legislation, parliament
  • Miranda: the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of “terrorism”

    Carl Gardner
    January 19, 2016

    I’ve already criticised what I think is a fundamental contradiction undermining the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the Miranda case. But there’s another aspect of the judgment that I must mention, which may well be of more lasting […]

    Tags: Court of Appeal, freedom of expression, human rights, interpretation, judicial review, terrorism
  • The self-contradictory Miranda appeal ruling

    Carl Gardner
    January 19, 2016

    I’ve been following for some time David Miranda’s challenge to the lawfulness of his questioning at Heathrow airport in 2013. I wrote shortly after his detention; I covered his application for an injunction;

    Tags: Court of Appeal, freedom of expression, human rights, judicial review, terrorism
  • Proportionality, at length: the Supreme Court’s “QASA” ruling

    Carl Gardner
    June 24, 2015

    The Supreme Court has in today’s judgment in R (Lumsdon) v Legal Services Board ruled lawful the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates, as approved by the Legal Services Board. The scheme will require […]

    Tags: advocacy, barristers, eu law, judicial review, proportionality, regulation, UK Supreme Court
  • R (Miranda) v Home Secretary: witness statement of Detective Supt. Caroline Goode

    Carl Gardner
    October 2, 2013

    A few weeks ago I published the witness statement of Oliver Robbins served on behalf of the Home Secretary in the Miranda case. That statement referred (at para. 32) to a further statement to be served by the police, […]

    Tags: injunctions, judicial review, media law, terrorism
  • Geoffrey Robertson QC: there is a hidden agenda

    Carl Gardner
    June 4, 2013

    Geoffrey Robertson2

    Geoffrey Robertson’s was another impressive speech today. He reminded us of the days of the “dock brief” and of what Stephen Sedley has called the “great sleep” of public law in the […]

    Tags: crime, government, judicial review, legal aid
  • Dinah Rose QC: a declaration of a lack of interest

    Carl Gardner
    June 4, 2013

    Dinah Rose QC

    Here’s Dinah Rose’s speech at the “Save Justice” demonstration in front of the Ministry of Justice this afternoon. She began with a “declaration of a lack of interest” as someone who’s […]

    Tags: government, judicial review, legal aid
  • Hunt’s handling of the NewsCorp-BSkyB deal was unlawful

    Carl Gardner
    April 25, 2012

    Yesterday’s big news was the relevation at the Leveson Inquiry of the e-mails from Frédéric Michel to his NewsCorp colleagues about his contact with Jeremy Hunt, or at least with Jeremy Hunt’s special adviser, while Hunt was preparing to […]

    Tags: constitution, government, judicial review, media law
  • Children’s Rights Alliance v Justice Secretary: campaign groups and human rights

    Carl Gardner
    January 17, 2012

    It’s not unusual nowadays for campaign groups of all kinds to take judicial review proceedings against public authorities: it’s now well established that their knowledge of and involvement in matters of public interest means they can have a sufficient interest […]

    Tags: children, human rights, judicial review
  • R (Bailey) v Brent: law against the cuts (and politics)

    Carl Gardner
    December 20, 2011

    As a resident of Brent in north-west London, I’m not sure what I think about the Labour council’s planned library cuts. I’m not happy that any should be cut. I don’t want social care to be cut any more than […]

    Tags: discrimination, judicial review, local government
12Next
Copyright 2022 Carl Gardner. Site by Samsara
Page load link
Go to Top